November 28, 2024
We have never met a Jew we didn't like; but we can't say the same about the
ones we haven't. Zion, today, lives on land that Biblically was given
to them via Abraham and his descendants; with some accompanying
conditions; for one, the extinction to a man of the tribes living on it,
some of whom were relatives by blood, indeed, the Canaanites. But the Assyrians
split the kingdoms and took Israel captive, leaving Judah to maintain dibs on
Canaan while their kin
fragmented and disappeared into the Assyrian/Babylonian universe, although maintaining their
Hebraic identity, learning everywhere they went, most notably the business arts, law - and war.
They adopted the Assyrian code: an ancient, brutal forerunner of Machiavellianism, still clinging to
their "Promised Land" contention no matter where they went.
The English and the fledgling UN helped fulfill that "Promise," although they were coaxed into
abandoning their protectionism by outright Jewish terrorism. Maybe it
was payback for the Crusades. (The atrocities of the Crusaders against
Jew, Moslem and Christian is a crime of ungodly proportions conveniently ignored
by educator and pedagogue alike. The Knights Templar were not the only heartless
bastards mounted on a horse.)
God gave Canaan to the Hebrews at a time when the only land that they could claim
was what they would be able to hold with sword and shield. Which was a lot
to expect from a restless band of wanderers who carried their godhead around on a litter.
The number of Jews left in Palestine (Canaan) after WWII were not enough to stave off
the hordes of non-Jews in the Levant who hated them. The British left reluctantly.
The Jews not only survived, but prevailed.
Wise men for millennia have debated the boundaries of the Jews' "Promised"
land, their exact entitlements as the “Chosen,” and, a questionable historical timeline.
The Diaspora throws more than one monket wrench into the arguments. At HS dropout
level, we're only smart enough to keep from questioning Zionist
contentions. Their god evidently gave them the license to unhesitatingly eliminate gentiles.
Battles against the Sword of Gideon are obviously unwinnable. Reference to Gideon's
Sword is metaphorical. Gideon won the battle against the Midianites with a wooden club.
And Israel was the architect of what we sanctimoniously identify today as terrorism {although
America has done its share of it.)
In their first exile, in an exchange of cruel infanticides, after the "seven plagues" failed
to move Egypt's Pharoah, the Jews proved to be better than him at murdering children in their sleep. So he gave
them their freedom and let them exit Egypt. Violence against non-combatants is an unreluctant
Jewish strategy. They've
used it against Romans, Arabs, the Crusaders, and non-Jewish semites.
In America, the term "terrorism" itself as state sponsored acts of non-war violence was coined
by the Founders. The history of its evolution since then can be found
HERE .
For some reason that's more obscure than obvious, Christians claim a link
between Judaism and their version of religion. Christianity in the heart of white bread
Westerners began to decline when the first Roman adopted it. This assertion here brooks no
debate. If you want somebody that you think is qualified enough to prove otherwise, you can
probably find him in a safehouse for pedophiles, or a rectumry (sic), or a massage parlor.
Today, some Americans hate Jews for reasons that defy rationale; some hate Palestinians because they
harbor Hamas; both are semites and Palestinians and terrorists. If a Jew can justify
terrorism, why can't a Moslem?
Rather than say, "Fuck the Jews!" or
Fuck the Palestinians!" say, "Fuck everybody!" Be what you know you really are! And stay
out of semites with guns! They will all "eat you for lunch!"
Americans have no dog in the fight.
The question remains: WHILE it is largely impossible to smuggle a handful of rice into Gaza,
how did the Mossad, arguably the best spy apparatus on the planet, fail to root out the massive
imports of war materials into Palestine and an approximate timetable for the October 7th
assault where the weapons were unquestionably meant to be used?
The kids are right. Pimples and bad choices are not uncommon, but antisemitism is. Some of them are
Jewish. They're just tired of the carnage. They know what it's like to live under the gun.
The price of eggs in America is not the problem: the problem is getting home alive from the store.
Or from school.
A minor Postscript here:
2008 to 2020 ACE, there were 5,590 Palestinians killed by Israelis and 252 israelis killed
by Palestinians. Those stats are
HERE. On Oct. 7, 2023, about 1,200 Jews were killed. The numbers of attackers killed is vague.
The use of the Hannibal directive on that day by the Israelites against civilians and the military both
is confirmed by
the UN's Independent International Commission of Inquiry.
READ HERE.
The COI confirmed that an "Israeli tank crew had
applied the Hannibal Directive by shooting at
a vehicle which they suspected was
transporting abducted Israeli soldiers".
the COI verified information
indicating that, in at least 2 other cases,
the security forces had likely applied the
Hannibal Directive, resulting in the killing
of up to 14 Israeli civilians.
"the Commission found that
Israeli tank fire killed some or all of the
13 civilian hostages held in a house in Beeri,"
it said, referring to another Kibbutz.
READ AGAIN
The Hannibal Directive is an Israeli Policy of preventing both soldiers and civilians from
being taken by Hamas, so that they won't have to endure torture, or
become bargaining points in trades for hostages. Captured Americans are not exempt from this
decree.
